Skip to content
Agent Mode AI
Publication · Insights

How often do this publication’s claims still hold?

Aggregate trust signal across every claim Agent Mode AI has made since 19 Jul 2025. The full ledger is at /holding/; the methodology is at /standards/. Computed on every deploy.

Holding rate
86%

73 of 85 claims this publication has made are still marked Holding as of 2026-04-29. 6 are marked Partial with a public correction log. 6 are marked Not holding. Every claim runs on a published review cadence. Nothing is quietly removed.

Verdict distribution

Holding 73 (86%)Partial 6 (7%)Not holding 6 (7%)

Cadence health

85
Total claims tracked
AM- + OPS- registers
60d
Median cadence
time between publish and next review
3d
Median age (still holding)
how long the median holding claim has held
5
Due in 30 days
claims hitting next review window
0
Overdue
past nextReviewDate, not yet reviewed
66 / 19
Enterprise / operators
register split

Recent verdict changes

DateVerdictClaim · Article
19 Apr 2026PartialAM-020 · The hidden costs of agentic AI: a CFO's guide to true TCO and ROI modeling
19 Apr 2026PartialAM-023 · Google AI Mode restaurant booking: the template for every partner-aggregation vertical
19 Apr 2026PartialAM-018 · Back-office vs front-office: where agentic AI's economics actually compound
19 Apr 2026PartialAM-018 · Back-office vs front-office: where agentic AI's economics actually compound
19 Apr 2026PartialAM-017 · Salesforce's 9,000-person redeployment: the template most enterprises will copy
19 Apr 2026PartialAM-017 · Salesforce's 9,000-person redeployment: the template most enterprises will copy
19 Apr 2026PartialAM-021 · DMAIC for agentic AI deployment: why the 87% / 27% success gap reflects measurement discipline, not methodology
19 Apr 2026PartialAM-022 · The agentic AI success formula: what 171% average ROI actually hides
19 Apr 2026PartialAM-019 · Manufacturing 4.0: How multi-agent systems reduce downtime by 30%

Upcoming reviews (next 90 days)

DueClaimStatus
+20d · 19 May 2026AM-003GPT-5 Pro's tiered-subscription model forces enterprises to classify problems by computational difficulty — $200/month premium routing only repays for the to…Holding
+27d · 26 May 2026OPS-005At sub-1M tokens per month (typical SMB agent volume) in 2026, the absolute dollar gap between Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-4o-mini, and Gemini 2.5 Flash is small e…Holding
+27d · 26 May 2026OPS-003For a solo founder choosing exactly one consumer AI subscription at around $20/month in 2026, the choice between Claude Pro and ChatGPT Plus is workflow-shap…Holding
+27d · 26 May 2026OPS-002For a 5-person consultancy already on either Notion or ClickUp in 2026, the AI features alone do not justify a workspace switch; the bundling difference (Not…Holding
+27d · 26 May 2026OPS-001For a 4–10 person ops team running ~50 automations including five agentic steps in 2026, the platform choice is binary between n8n self-hosted and Make.com P…Holding
+45d · 13 Jun 2026OPS-036An SMB AI policy that actually changes day-to-day behaviour fits on one page and contains exactly eight clauses — sanctioned tools, prohibited data, human-re…Partial
+45d · 13 Jun 2026OPS-035There are five categories of small-business work where AI substitution in 2026 costs more in trust and liability exposure than it saves in productivity: (1) …Holding
+45d · 13 Jun 2026OPS-034For a solo founder processing 100-300 emails a day in 2026, the cheap-stack option (Gmail labels + Claude Pro at $20/month + a 5-line prompt template) recove…Holding
+45d · 13 Jun 2026OPS-033AI customer-service automation at 1-10 employee scale clears net-positive only when 70% or more of weekly inquiries are repetitive, low-stakes, and factually…Holding
+45d · 13 Jun 2026OPS-032For SMB content workflows in 2026 (blog drafts, weekly newsletter, social copy, email sequences) at a 1-to-10 person business shipping two-to-four pieces per…Holding
+45d · 13 Jun 2026OPS-031Solo founders evaluating AI bookkeeping in 2026 face three realistic options: a fully-managed AI-augmented service (Bench, Pilot), a software-led tool that d…Holding
+50d · 18 Jun 2026AM-020The 40-60% TCO underestimate on enterprise agentic-AI deployments is not a cost-visibility failure — it is a cross-departmental cost-attribution failure. Int…Holding
Methodology. Every claim is dated, scored, and reviewed on a published cadence. Status mutates; claim text never changes once published. Corrections append; nothing is silently removed. The full editorial standard lives at /standards/; the machine-readable feed of every claim is at /facts.json; the full ledger is at /holding/.