Skip to content
Holding·last review12 May 2026

For a freelance translator below 0.10 €/word, accepting MTPE rates at agency-standard 40–60% of full rate is rational only when productivity exceeds 1.8× source-rate baseline; below that ratio, MTPE work is rate-cannibalising and the freelancer should refuse it or move directly to higher-margin language pairs.

Operators register. Cohort: solo freelance translator, 0.04–0.18 €/word band, CAT-tool users (Trados/memoQ/Wordfast). Primary trigger: sustained MTPE rate compression below 35% of full rate across major pairs (CSA Research tracks) or a major CAT vendor shipping native Claude/GPT-4o plugin with full tag handling. The 1.8× productivity threshold is editorial synthesis (source: our-estimate) consistent with CSA Research fatigue-rate data and TAUS post-editing productivity studies. Sister claims: OPS-003 (Claude Pro vs ChatGPT Plus for solo founder), OPS-061 (AI delegation framework).

Published
12 May 2026
Last reviewed
12 May 2026
Next review
+29d· 11 Jun 2026
Cohort
solo freelance translator
Cadence
30-day
Sibling claim
OPS-003Claude Pro vs ChatGPT Plus for solo founder
Embed this claimiframe + oEmbed
HTML iframe
Paste-the-URL (Substack, Medium, Notion, WordPress)

The card auto-updates when the claim's status, last-reviewed date, or correction log changes. Embedders never need to refresh — the card is rendered live from the canonical record.

About this register

The Operators register tracks claims published from practitioner-advisory pieces addressed to solo founders, micro-SMB, and small businesses up to around fifty people. Claims are reviewed on a 30–45 day cadence — tooling and SMB-relevant pricing shift faster than enterprise procurement signals.

Recent corrections in Operators

  • OPS-036 · Partial · 29 Apr 2026

    Initial publication 29 Apr 2026. Status set to Partial at publication because clause 6 commentary references an order-of-magnitude remediation-cost gap derived from the IAPP 2024 AI Governance Profession Report; the report characterises the gap as material but does not publish a precise multiple, so the wording is annotated source: our-estimate. REVIEW: Peter to source a precise figure or amend the commentary.

  • OPS-035 · Holding · 29 Apr 2026

    Initial publication 29 Apr 2026. Status set to Partial at publication because category 5 lacks the same regulatory/cited-consequence anchor as categories 1-4. REVIEW: Peter to confirm category 5 evidence base and either upgrade to Holding (with strengthened citation) or amend the claim to four categories.

  • OPS-034 · Holding · 29 Apr 2026

    Initial publication 29 Apr 2026 with status=partial. Cost-side claims (vendor pricing) verifiable against the four cited pricing pages on the publication date. Time-recovery claim (90+ min compressed to ~20 min) drawn from published productivity-blogger benchmarks rather than Peter-run measurement; first-cohort replication on the publication's tracked operator cohort due by 13 Jun 2026. REVIEW: Peter.

Reviews coming up in Operators

  • OPS-005 · Holding · next +13d (26 May 2026)

    At sub-1M tokens per month (typical SMB agent volume) in 2026, the absolute dollar gap between Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-4o…

  • OPS-003 · Holding · next +13d (26 May 2026)

    For a solo founder choosing exactly one consumer AI subscription at around $20/month in 2026, the choice between Claude…

  • OPS-002 · Holding · next +13d (26 May 2026)

    For a 5-person consultancy already on either Notion or ClickUp in 2026, the AI features alone do not justify a workspac…